Search for: "House v. State"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 25,341
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2007, 8:24 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 7:30 am
The court will hear Timbs v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 2:23 am
On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 844 This appeal considered whether a condition restricting the use of the premises should be implied into a planning permission granted by the appellant; alternatively, whether the planning permission should be interpreted as containing such a condition. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
§1257 under Michigan v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am
Can the police search the house then? [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:52 am
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. [read post]
22 May 2013, 12:24 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 10:39 pm
The Supreme Court's June 20 decision in Moore v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 12:43 pm
In Fabozzi v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
Department of Housing and Urban Development, et al. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 6:40 am
Clearing House Ass'n suggests that the justices are feeling a little abashed at how their aggressive defense of preemption in Watters v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 9:49 am
State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 4:03 pm
Since Chimel - many other cases have broadened this holding including the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:28 am
ID=346 In MAUM Meditation House of Truth v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:29 pm
Like here (in a case involving State Farm, no less), here and here. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 7:39 am
First, does United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 9:13 pm
Well, in United States v. [read post]