Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 7,536
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2021, 4:34 pm
First, local elected officials and/or police chiefs acted swiftly and decisively, and in most instances adopted policies or announced plans for policy changes that were more forward-leaning than those previously discussed on a statewide level. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:33 am
You know, that was a huge Supreme Court decision. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:35 pm
Decisions this Week European Court of Human RightsCase of Lutsenko and Verbytskyy v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 9:28 am
Furthermore, when defamation is alleged by a public official, the speaker must be shown to have acted with actual malice. [read post]
12 May 2021, 6:25 pm
What did Signal say they’re going to do about this? [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:35 am
President Joe Biden and Congress now face a decision about what to do with the 1033 program: should they re-reform it, or put a stop to transfers of military equipment to local police departments? [read post]
12 May 2021, 5:01 am
How many could take themselves to an official California state budget web site to discover the answers? [read post]
7 May 2021, 12:30 pm
You're going to look at the merits of this one. [read post]
7 May 2021, 11:49 am
“What is happening in India and Brazil could happen elsewhere unless we all take these public health precautions. [read post]
7 May 2021, 9:00 am
To meet these basic requirements, the FAR states an agency level bid protest must be addressed to the contracting officer or the official designated to receive protests. [read post]
6 May 2021, 11:25 am
Not all FISC decisions are disappointing. [read post]
6 May 2021, 11:08 am
We agree with the OB that for transparency and accountability purposes, if Facebook decides to censor a public official, the company should have a consistent plan in place for preserving the offending speech for transparency, research, and historical record purposes. [read post]
5 May 2021, 12:11 pm
Do officials in the public policy department intervene for such high-profile decisions? [read post]
5 May 2021, 4:03 am
Faculty at Rutgers, a public university in New Jersey, discussed Friday whether to voluntarily bar racial epithets from being spoken in class, even in the context of quoting court decisions. [read post]
4 May 2021, 6:06 am
Further, the public reaction pointed to a government increasingly out-of-step with the public, which may support increased Internet regulation, but not at any cost. [read post]
3 May 2021, 3:00 pm
" The student quoted the word, I take it on the sensible theory that, when you're studying court cases, you're entitled to talk accurately about what those court cases say. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:12 am
See, e.g., In re T.R. (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 6, 16 n.9 (observing that traditionally civil actions involving adults "are presumptively open to the public" at common law); Doe v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 1:17 pm
This law should not be read to impose additional qualifications on elected federal officials. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 12:30 pm
We're also super dubious of the merits of the claims. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am
The Justice Department describes pattern-or-practice reviews as one of the department’s “central tools for accomplishing police reform, restoring police-community trust, and strengthening officer and public safety. [read post]
