Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 2,182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2011, 11:10 am
D. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:33 pm
That they prevail unless the legal system concludes that the decisions are against the child’s best interest? [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Petitioner then commenced a proceeding seeking registration and enforcement of the Texas order ( Domestic Relations Law 77-d, 77-g). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 1:57 am
Freedom Before Self Interest: Views of Two Wartime Veterans, by Clifford D. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:13 pm
Although perhaps an interesting piece of trivia, you might want to know a few more details. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 5:34 am
The seventh item – which is the one I find most interesting – was “a copy of the hard drive with the alleged child pornography redacted. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:55 pm
B. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:45 am
If not lawyers, he’d be a writer and she’d be an interior designer. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:02 pm
They ask me if I’d be interested in serving as an expert witness in a case, and usually they want me to testify as to what the law is. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 10:48 am
Person B is Rielle Hunter. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:42 am
Third, the representative plaintiffs would receive $1,000 "per affected child for each Plaintiff. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:11 am
Ct. 1980), aff’d, 185 N.J. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:18 am
It stated that the best interests of the child are determined by a review of the totality of the circumstances. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:24 am
That’s a surprisingly complex question, and I’d like to break down the answer into two parts: the parental rights question in this post, and the religious freedom question in another post.As of 2005, about 56% of newborn American boys, and about 31% of American boys in the Western states, were circumcised. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:35 pm
Mating Déjà Vu with a Mobius Strip in the Graveyard of Empire By Tom Engelhardt, originally published at TomDispatch, May 19, 2011. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:43 am
Ct.), aff’d 121 N.J. [read post]
16 May 2011, 5:21 am
It directed that since an award of child support may be made "effective as of the date of the application therefor" (Domestic Relations Law 236[B][7][a] ), on remittal, the Supreme Court's new child support award should be made retroactive to August 27, 2007. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:32 am
She'd incurred $311,242 in fees for the entire case while his fees totaled $141,384. [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:05 am
N.J.S.A. 3B:12A-1(b), -6(d)(3); see P.P., supra, 180 N.J. at 507-08. [read post]
6 May 2011, 12:50 pm
Edward Markey (D-Mass.) and Joe Barton (R-Texas) have released a discussion draft of their forthcoming “Do Not Track Kids Act of 2011. [read post]
