Search for: "In re Interest of Steven S."
Results 1661 - 1680
of 2,215
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2010, 12:37 pm
By In re Yamashita (upholding the military commission trial of a Japanese general), issued the year before Justice Stevens took up work at the Court, Rutledge was writing in dissent, rejecting the Government’s position “that there is no law restrictive upon these proceedings other than whatever rules and regulations may be prescribed for their government by the executive authority or the military,” in favor of the view that the U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 10:53 am
In particular, I’m interested in your thoughts about how some language from yesterday’s opinion in the Stevens animal cruelty video case may affect the constitutional status of sexting. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:59 am
Breyer, arguing in dissent that the award at issue was proper, was joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and John Paul Stevens. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:41 pm
Suchterm shall not include—‘‘(i) children’s metal jewelry;‘‘(ii) painted children’s toys (as theterm ‘children’s toy’ is defined in section108(e)(1)(B));‘‘(iii) children’s products composedprimarily of accessible vinyl;‘‘(iv) any children’s product for whichthe donating party or the seller has actualknowledge that the product is in violationof the lead limits… [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:59 pm
Stevens seem to mention this theory favorably in the decision. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:28 am
“Who cares what the language of the law says,” he seems to be arguing, “let’s focus on what the policy of the law was supposed to be, and let’s engage in a balancing of interests to determine what the law means at this particular moment. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:53 am
"the chaser’s hansen and taylor launch mockumentary series on triple j" http://bit.ly/cUIyQD @mikeee i know you're a fan of brizzly but have you tried twazzup? [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
We realize it’s (arguably) regrettable that, in 2010, we’re even making this recommendation. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
His replacement might be less willing to do so. * * * * * For ninety percent of readers, everything you’re going to want to know about this post appears above. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
You're dead. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Justice Stevens joined in O’Connor’s opinion. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 10:38 pm
(Steven Greenhut, “The Militarization of American Police” (March 2008) The Freeman: Ideas on Liberty, vol. 58, issue 2.) [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:30 pm
Justice Stevens is a tennis player, as was the late Chief Justice Rehnquist. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:22 pm
Today, we're back. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
By Steven G. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:45 pm
Interesting, eh? [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 11:56 am
This being proxy season, we’re coming across a lot of disclosures that don’t quite stand on their own, but which are interesting all the same. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:29 am
By Steven G. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 6:01 am
For one thing, I was surprised by Adam Liptak's coverage of Stevens' retirement the next day after Scalia's presentation, because the punchline of the NYT coverage was that Stevens was the last person appointed/confirmed to the SCT on the basis of competence (or independence) as opposed to ideology. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
Mud Buddy, LLC d/b/a Mud Buddy Manufacturing (Docket Report) District Court Utah: Post-motion correction of discovery deficiency warrants sanctions: CleanCut v Rug Doctor et al (Docket Report) District Court C D California answers: May an inventor previously employed by plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest serve as an expert for defendant? [read post]
