Search for: "JOHN DOE, official and individual"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 3,321
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
That explanation was not attributed to any official, and was not explained. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 10:03 am
Even Congress’ most vociferous privacy watchdogs, such as Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Representative John Conyers (D-MI), acknowledge the value of Section 702 and are not demanding its expiration. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
” But the filing does not list a foreign agent, one of the key purposes of a Foreign Agents Registration Act disclosure. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:44 pm
First, Jaffer’s thought: Does the First Amendment Restrict Trump on Twitter? [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:15 am
” Back in 2014 in Massachusetts, the case of Jane Doe Vs. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 7:57 pm
John G. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 7:38 pm
Chairman, that other individual who served our country as well with great distinction, whose no longer a member of the administration has the chance to relay his version of those facts. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 5:10 pm
Thus, when public officials deliver public speeches, we recognize that their words are not exclusively a transmission from the government because those oratories have embedded within them the inherently personal views of the speaker as an individual member of the polity. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:58 am
That was John Adams. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 8:36 am
Panelists include Brigadier General Gerald Galloway, Sherri Goodman, General Ron Keys, Rear Admiral Ann Phillips, and John Conger. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 6:19 am
They try to suborn individuals and try to get individuals, including U.S. individuals, to act on their behalf, wittingly or unwittingly. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 5:03 am
(Here is the latest edition of the Institute for Justice’s weekly Short Circuit newsletter, written by John Ross.) [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
The SOE does not easily fit within the classical division of obligation, expressed in political and legal theory, between public and private entities, and their respective relationship to law.[3] States have a duty which is undertaken through law;[4] enterprises have a responsibility which is embedded in their governance.[5] These fundamental divisions form part of the current international efforts to institutionalize human rights related norms on and through states and enterprises, and… [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
As far back as Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinions in Marbury v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
As far back as Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinions in Marbury v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm
’: Lara Bingle in Search of a Cause of Action, Jason John Boslandand Vicki T. [read post]
31 May 2017, 11:45 am
Where Does Drone Regulation Goes From Here? [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am
” That minimizes the psychological harm that flows from confronting official action preferring or disfavoring a particular religion and, in any event, does not account for the impact on families. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:34 am
Under a November change to the state constitution, Missouri voters overwhelmingly capped contributions to individual candidates for office at $2,600 per election. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
