Search for: "King v. State"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 6,214
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2018, 2:52 pm
Kings Cty. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:01 am
Matter of Hammad v Al-Lid Food Corp., Decision and Order, Index No. 518406/17 [Sup Ct Kings County May 29, 2018], decided last month by Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Sylvia G. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:35 pm
I was also severely critical of the Obama Administration's unlawful implementation of many ACA provisions and helped develop the arguments that formed the basis for the claims in King v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:03 pm
The brief cites to findings in NFIB and King v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 11:20 am
The true scope of the elusive but all pervasive party autonomy doctrine was at the heart of the debate in the case of Rock Advertising Limited v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:20 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 3:01 pm
The Howey Test, deriving from a decades-old case, Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division's ruling states:"The article 78 court correctly determined, upon consideration of all the facts, that respondents' denial of petitioner's application for reinstatement to his former position with NYCHA was not arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion (see Matter of Roberts v Gavin, 96 AD3d 669, 671 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:05 am
Eisenstadt, Enemy and Ally: Religion in Loving v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:32 am
This case is a huge personal win for Joseph Groia, who has been carrying this burden since after R. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:32 am
This case is a huge personal win for Joseph Groia, who has been carrying this burden since after R. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 4:12 pm
[State of Texas v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:43 am
The structure of s 117B(6) is straightforward because it unambiguously states that there is no public interest in removal where a person has a genuine and subsisting parental relationship with a qualifying child and it would not be reasonable to expect the child to leave the UK. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:15 am
State of MarylandPeople v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
-- SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 5:52 am
A retail employee, who intervened in the EEOC’s discrimination suit, complained that managers and coworkers made frequent offensive remarks, including calling him “boy,” “Shadow,” “King Kong,” and “Spook. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:42 am
Sch. v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:01 am
HomeStreet, Inc., [2] was issued by the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:54 am
In King Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
