Search for: "Land v. State"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 13,218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2008, 1:41 pm
Sand & Gravel v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 9:28 am
Recently, the Indiana Supreme Court decided that a business that loses customer traffic due to a State highway expansion project is not entitled to compensation.1 In State of Indiana v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:11 pm
Here are the latest filings in Maunalua Bay Beach Ohana 28 v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 10:51 am
In the case, Hayes v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:37 pm
Rosebud Sioux Tribe (casino management contract)* United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2014dct.htmlCases featured: Jones v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
For instance, the transfer of Indian Affairs from the Department of War to the Department of the Interior in 1849 prefigured the later ruling, in Lone Wolf v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 9:02 pm
The idea was that the federal government has no business impressing a land use cookie cutter across the country.Starting with Village of Euclid v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 10:53 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 12:53 am
Judge freezes assets of Madoff figure Stanley Chais, LATimes.com, October 9, 2009 SIPC v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 5:05 am
These recent rulings came in State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
Check out SpringLaw’s Boss Law Bootcamp, which contains guides, checklists and templates to help with that softer landing for all. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:35 pm
Knick v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:42 pm
Harper v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:42 pm
Harper v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:50 pm
Passed legislation: Puyallup Tribe of Indians Land Into Trust Confirmation Act of 2023 / A bill to take certain land in the State of Washington into trust for the benefit of the Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup Reservation, and for other purposes. - became Public Law No: 118-48 on 4/19/2024. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 10:18 am
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act) Simmons v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 9:11 am
Court of Appeals in a case entitled ACLU v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 7:09 am
As stated in another decision, It is not an ownership right, but a right to a specific use of another's property. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
., v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 1:59 pm
Locke v. [read post]