Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 11,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
SELF-SERVING ASSERTIONS DIDN’T CUT ITIn Shalimar Leasing, LP v M., a landlord commenced a holdover proceeding in landlord-tenant court alleging that its rent-stabilized tenant wasn't really living in the unit – that she primarily resided elsewhere. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:18 pm
Naffe appealed the ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:46 pm
In Janus v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:02 pm
United States & Carabell v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 6:28 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:03 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 3:46 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
The unanimity of the justices was matched, to an unusual degree, by unanimity among the States and Central government (appearing as interveners in the hearing), whose Solicitors-General ‘grasped the nettle and decided to present a united front’ in seeking a new approach.[2]The decision itself drew upon both existing disenchantment with orthodoxy (or the lack of any accepted interpretation) and upon scholarly critiques, particularly those of Michael Coper (who appeared… [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:10 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 10:13 am
Miranda rights suffer another setback in the United States Supreme Court case of Berghuis v. [read post]
29 Sep 2004, 11:19 am
"); United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:46 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently heard argument in Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 2:03 pm
Even though the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the people from unreasonable searches and seizures, people still get pulled over with little justification. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 5:09 am
” To determine whether a search or seizure becomes a joint venture, the acts of the United States agents must be examined in light of the “totality of acts done in the search and seizure. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 12:29 pm
United States (No. 08-108), argued earlier this Term, Nijhawan v. [read post]
12 Nov 2004, 11:07 am
We posted on Elwood v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 2:51 pm
CAAF has issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
