Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 5,344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2018, 5:30 am
-P. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:12 am
On remand, Judge Thornton, now presiding over the Complex Commercial Division, referred the attorneys’ fees trial to Special Magistrate Retired Chief Judge Joseph P. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 3:56 am
Ouellette, "Does Running Out Of (Some) Trademarks Matter? [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 1:51 pm
§ 1836(b)(3)(A)(i)(I)). [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:54 am
La Corte suprema slovena si confronta con i danni punitivi, Danno e responsabilità 1/2014, p. 18 et seq.). [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am
The FairPlay coalition comprising more than 25 organizations representing hundreds of thousands of members of Canada’s creative community made a reasonable proposal to the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), Canada’s telecommunications and broadcast regulator, to address the scourge of online copyright infringement.[1] The proposal, which involves website blocking, was immediately attacked by anti-copyright activist Michael Geist… [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
JurisdictionThe Court has jurisdiction over this matter under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:46 am
Together with its statement of grounds of appeal the following document was filed:D11: Declaration of Hermann Böcker, dated 20 October 2014VIII. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:46 am
Together with its statement of grounds of appeal the following document was filed:D11: Declaration of Hermann Böcker, dated 20 October 2014VIII. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
., ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND FOR ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED, Petitioners,v.CASH BIZ, LP, CASH ZONE, LLC D/B/A CASH BIZ, AND REDWOOD FINANCIALS, LLC, Respondents.No. 16-0854.Supreme Court of Texas.Argued September 15, 2017.Opinion delivered: February 23, 2018. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:52 pm
§ 1836(b)(3)(A)(i)(I)). [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The City of Oakwood also pointed out that: a) its property maintenance code contains an administrative appeal procedure for property owners to challenge any decision or order of a code official, and no Oakwood property owner (including plaintiffs), has filed an administrative appeal challenging the point of sale ordinance; b) Oakwood has never denied a property owner an occupancy permit or cited a property owner for failure to comply with the pre-sale inspection requirement, and c) to… [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The City of Oakwood also pointed out that: a) its property maintenance code contains an administrative appeal procedure for property owners to challenge any decision or order of a code official, and no Oakwood property owner (including plaintiffs), has filed an administrative appeal challenging the point of sale ordinance; b) Oakwood has never denied a property owner an occupancy permit or cited a property owner for failure to comply with the pre-sale inspection requirement, and c) to… [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 7:35 am
Unfortunately, he appears to have appeared pro se and naturally failed to meet the technical requirements for a Rule 12 (b)(6) motion based on mootness. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:44 am
Second, even had the Gayes preserved their challenge, neither Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) nor our decisions in Westinghouse and El-Hakem v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:51 am
But if Congress had intended to refer to the definition in § 77(p)(f)(2) alone, it presumably would have done so—just by adding a letter, a number, and a few parentheticals. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:18 am
P., 90 A.D.2d 434, 437, 457 N.Y.S.2d 488 [1982]; Matter of Findlay, 253 N.Y. 1, 7, 170 N.E. 471 [1930]. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:18 am
P., 90 A.D.2d 434, 437, 457 N.Y.S.2d 488 [1982]; Matter of Findlay, 253 N.Y. 1, 7, 170 N.E. 471 [1930]. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:01 am
§1952(b)(i)(1).) [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 8:08 am
The appellants further argued that the claimed subject matter represented a technological improvement over the previous state of the art in digital assistants. [read post]
