Search for: "MATTER OF K A B"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 2,720
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2012, 9:23 pm
Clause (k) of Section 2 defines “juvenile” or “child” to mean a person who has not completed eighteenth year of age. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
William K. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm
Two Goldman Sachs’ employees also received Wells Notices from the Commission regarding the same subject matter. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm
Two Goldman Sachs’ employees also received Wells Notices from the Commission regarding the same subject matter. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 2:00 am
The opinion by Justice Terry B. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:59 am
Subpart B - Requirements for Long Term Care Facilities. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:38 am
§§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B), 846, and 18 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:01 pm
The Board notes further the undisputed fact that substantially all conceivable embodiments of the display pack defined in the granted claims 5 to 7 (which are formally not dependent from claim 1) appear also to be subject-matter of claim 1 as granted. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 5:01 pm
Therefore, the patent prohibition of R 28(d) which concerns processes for modifying the genetic identity of animals cannot be applied directly in respect of the subject-matter of claims 8 to 10. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 1:11 am
K (SII(S(K(S(S(K(SII(S(S(KS)(S(K(S(KS)))(S(K(S(S(KS)(SS(S(S(KS)K))(KK))))) (S(S(KS)(S(KK)(S(KS)(S(S(KS)(S(KK)(S(KS)(S(S(KS)(S(KK)(SII))) (K(SI(KK)))))))(K(S(K(S(S(KS)(S(K(SI))(S(KK)(S(K(S(S(KS)K)(S(S(KS)K)I) (S(SII)I(S(S(KS)K)I)(S(S(KS)K)))))(SI(K(KI)))))))))(S(KK)K)))))))(K(S(KK) … [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
DILJIT K. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
The Board had something to say on this matter:*** Translation of the German original ***Substantiation of the ground of opposition[2.1] The [patent proprietor] has submitted that the ground of opposition under A 100(b) EPC 1973 had been insufficiently substantiated and, consequently, was inadmissible.The ground of opposition under A 100(b) EPC 1973 has been introduced into the proceedings by the OD […]. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
Thus, the opposition ground according to A 100(c) would not hold against the subject-matter of claim 1 disclosing said amendment. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
But statistically, that doesn’t matter. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
Therefore, the [patent proprietor] concluded that for the part of the subject-matter of the claims that did not concern carboxylic acid imides and methyl urea derivatives as components (b) the claim to priority had to be valid.[2.1.4] Claim 1 as granted comprises the following components other than carboxylic acid imides and methyl urea derivatives in group (b): phosphoric acid esters, thiadiazoles, isothiazolinones, imidazoles, guanidines, aromatic carboxylic acids, and… [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:53 pm
Lincoln, B. (2010). [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:53 pm
Lincoln, B. (2010). [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:30 pm
Ruhl, B. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
The appellant did not file any further requests and objected that by not admitting its auxiliary requests 8 to 15 into the proceedings the Board had denied it the right to be heard and thus a fundamental violation of A 113 had occurred.By an order of 20 September 2011, the Enlarged Board (EBA) in its composition under R 109(2)(a) submitted the petition for review to the EBA in its composition under R 109(2)(b) – which, incidentally, does not happen very often ; only few petitions… [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
How did the Legal Board decide this matter? [read post]
