Search for: "MILLER v. STATE" Results 1661 - 1680 of 5,139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2018, 10:19 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The government raises a state action question and the court (with little discussion, and a cite to NY Times v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:19 am by Kent Scheidegger
Litigants have had fair notice since at least United States v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 9:07 am
Herman Miller (discussed in the March 31, 2008 post) is an example of such an application of the state antitrust antitrust laws. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:18 am
The Federal 5th Circuit Court of Appeals decided last week to reverse and remand the Houston district court's decision to throw out the case Fisher v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
Architectural Works, Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act, Pictorial Works, Copyright InfringementScholz Design, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Tune in to C-SPAN tonight at 6:30 EDT for a conversation about the book, featuring Balleisen, former Congressman Brad Miller, Senior Deputy Attorney General Kevin Anderson, and North Carolina State Historian David Zonderman. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 1:56 pm
about the "kill zone" theory in the recent case of People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Ainsworth, Amicus Curiae Brief: Stormans, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
This claim failed in court — most famously in Flood v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:30 am by Ray Dowd
Dowd from West here  Find Ray Dowd at Dunnington Bartholow & Miller LLP Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 6th Ed. 2012) by Raymond J. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  DRE That National Constitution Center session, The Life and Constitutional Legacy of Gouverneur Morris, with Melanie Randolph Miller, Dennis Rasmussen, William Treanor, and Jeffrey Rosen, is now up on YouTube. [read post]
10 May 2013, 7:41 am by Liisa Speaker
Because termination has constitutional implications to a parents right to the care custody and control of their children, I would think that the higher clear and convincing standard would be required (see Judge Gleicher's concurring opinion in Hollis v Miller). [read post]