Search for: "Majors v. Smith"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 2,978
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm
In the case of Harris v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Smith, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 915, at pp. 937-38), or “a sufficient substitute basis for testing the evidence” (Khelawon, at para. 105). [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 8:31 am
Summary of Decision issued October 6, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Sandoval v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 11:41 am
Justice Smith provided the following reasons: [17] There is no question that the plaintiff suffered major trauma in the accident. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 4:22 am
”The full text of the ruling is posted on the Internet at: http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2010/2010_01528.htm* Judge Smith dissents in an opinion. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:55 am
Smith, Assistant Attorney General.Facts/Discussion: A jury convicted Morris of felony property destruction. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
The ideologically confused majorities just described illustrate the point. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
Most observers understandably have focused on two major aspects of the ruling:(i) The Court held that customers have at least some "reasonable expectation of privacy" in the cell-site location information (CSLI) records that their service providers maintain about them--a new "exception" to the so-called "third-party doctrine," and thus a repudiation of the principle the Court announced in Smith v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:54 am
Smith, asking for the reversal of a black man's murder conviction by an all-white jury; here, on Berghuis v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
While the tenor of the arguments in both cases suggest that the dividing line is the degree of judicial deference to legislative will, the voting pattern suggests otherwise: Judges Read and Graffeo were in the minority in Tzolis and the majority in Appleton; Judges Smith and Pigott were in the majority in both; and Chief Judge Kaye and Judge Ciparick were in the… [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 4:26 am
In State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 6:56 am
Smith, The Morality of Regulation --Notes and Questions E. [read post]
4 May 2017, 5:45 pm
And do we care if the Court hears careful briefing and argument prior to a decision, or is it enough if a five-justice majority makes strikingly new law, as was the case in the famous Indian peyote case in Smith v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 8:51 am
Youngevity Int’l, Corp. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 7:27 am
Christie v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:34 am
The Court of Appeals' 5-1 decision in Walton v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 10:29 am
See Smith v. [read post]
