Search for: "Marks v. United States" Results 1661 - 1680 of 9,179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 2:04 am by John L. Welch
The WTO defense was equally useless: the Board pointed out that the "trademark registration opposition system in the United States provides equal treatment for all opposers and applicants, regardless of their national origin or status in the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:23 am
In a convincing opinion, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has upheld the Board's decision [TTABlogged here] finding the term GRUYERE to be generic for cheese, and thus unregistrable as a certification mark. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 10:06 pm by Walter Olson
Levine (20) Why wacky warnings matter (10) Vioxx: Mark Lanier’s smears of the Ernst v. [read post]
” Although the likelihood of confusion was ordinarily a fact-intensive issue, this was one of the rare instances in which the mark owner’s case was so weak that summary judgment was appropriate, in the Ninth Circuit’s view (Lerner & Rowe PC v. [read post]
Case date: 21 June 2024 Case number: No. 23-50413 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European Design Law … [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Rev. 1185 (2023)) on SSRN>  Here is the abstract: A huge number of tort suits in the United States are captioned Plaintiff & Spouse v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:58 am
§ 1498 (that statute has been used by private parties to establish that they cannot be held liable for infringement for any goods “used or manufactured by or for the United States”). [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:23 am by Christopher Tyner
This post summarizes an opinion issued by the United States Supreme Court on June 15, 2020. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Feb. 26, 2014) (non-precedential).IssueWhether the United States District Court for the District of Delaware properly "found that the subject matter of [U.S. [read post]