Search for: "Morris, Appeal of" Results 1661 - 1680 of 2,252
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2009, 7:42 am
Div. 2006), certif. granted, 191 N.J. 317 (2007), appeal dismissed, 196 N.J. 82 (2008); Farrell, supra, 320 N.J. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:19 am by Jonathan Marshall
N.J. appeals court rules with police departments in Alcotest drunken driving case, NJ.com, December, 3, 2009 [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 1:57 pm by mbrickley
The Altria Group - Phillip Morris’ parent company - claims it will appeal the verdict and that they do not agree with the state’s rules as they were “fundamentally unfair and unconstitutional. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 2:24 pm by Jim Gilbert
Naugle’s attorney proved that in the first three quarters of 2009, Philip Morris paid $3.1 billion in dividends to Altria, its parent company, It is expected that the Naugle verdict will be appealed, a process that will probably take years. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 7:06 am
The Alberta Court of Appeal had previously overturned _____'s acquittal. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 4:26 am
Philip Morris is expected to appeal the verdict in the case of Naugle v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) OHIM Board of Appeal rules on functional designs: R 690/2007-3 (Class 99) X5 and CEO Are they still riding side by side – Munich District Court and Turin District Court draw deviating conclusions in design dispute (Class 99) USPTO’s transparency puts Europe to shame (IAM) EU community patent and UPLS: Will there be a political breakthrough soon? [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 1:20 am by Cal Warriner
Today however, as Phillip Morris arrogantly thumbed its nose at yet another former customer who sat in the courtroom on oxygen, the strategy cost Phillip Morris 300 million dollars. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 8:55 am
This will clarify the basis of the order for further modifications or appeals. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 5:45 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Warsaw - Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences: Opinion (via EFF)...In Re Bernard L. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:01 am
By David Evans Nov. 9 (Bloomberg) -- Prosecutor Michael Loucks remembers clearly when lawyers for Pfizer Inc., the world's largest drug company, looked across the table and promised it wouldn't break the law again. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Counsel for Philip Morris had argued that the city law violates the company's First Amendment right to advertise its product. [read post]