Search for: "National By-products, Inc. v. the United States"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 1,808
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
See Albertsons, Inc., v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 3:16 pm
Greene v AP Products Ltd., 475 Mich 502 (2006). [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:12 pm
The Board separately remanded to the judge the claims of six other individuals for a determination of whether they were authorized to be present and employed in the United States during the backpay period and thus entitled to backpay. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:41 pm
Navajo Nation Issue: Whether the Court's prior decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 9:00 pm
[5] National Conference of State Legislatures, State Right to Publicity Laws, [www.ncsl.org] (last visited Sept. 29, 2008). [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO General Assembly opens: New Director-General delivers acceptance speech (IPRoo) (IAM) (WIPO) (WIPO) (WIPO) (IPKat) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) (IP Menu News) CAFC: 'Point of novelty' design test thrown out; the value of amicus briefs: Egyptian Goddess,… [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
See, e.g., Hopson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IPRoo), Review of National Innovation System – Key points for corporate counsel: (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), Review of National Innovation System recommends creative commons: (creativecommons.org), Review of Innovation System released: (IP Menu News), What [right]’s in a [business] name: Westpac Banking Corporation v McMillan & Melbas On The Park Pty Ltd (formerly Credit Systems Australia Pty Ltd): (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Senator… [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 10:05 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 7:20 pm
In Chattin v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, August 25, 2008 United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:52 pm
After all, the Third Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:52 pm
After all, the Third Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 2:07 am
Star Scientific, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Chronimed Holdings, Inc. [read post]
