Search for: "No. 337" Results 1661 - 1680 of 4,155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2020, 1:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
On Wednesday, the ITC issued a Final Determination in the case, finding that the sale and importation of the products into the United States violated Section 337 of the U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 3:57 pm
If you or a loved one has suffered harm as a result of a motor vehicle accident, contact the attorneys at Broussard & David to discuss your legal rights at (337) 233-2323 (local) or (888) 337-2323 (toll-free). [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 7:04 am by Docket Navigator
" Vision-Based Driver Assistance System Cameras and Components Thereof, 337-TA-907 (ITC December 1, 2015, Order) (Trade Commission, J.) [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:01 pm by Dennis Crouch
Section 337 does not depend on the mode of importation; it depends on whether the imported goods infringe a patent or copyright or trademark or design. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:27 pm by Bernard J. Cassidy
According to the ITC, "Smartphone companies involved in Section 337 investigations during the first half of FY 2012 include: Apple (14), HTC (8), Motorola (4), Samsung (3), RIM (3), Nokia (3), and LG (1). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 1:20 pm by Eric Schweibenz
On February 19, 2010, the ITC issued a Notice that it intends to survey complainants who obtained exclusion orders that are currently in effect pursuant to proceedings under Section 337. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 12:38 pm by Matthew Huisman
Hess adds experience litigating before the International Trade Commission and handling Section 337 Investigations. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 12:53 pm by Merritt Blakeslee & Scott Daniels
Put simply, Section 337 requires that an ITC complainant show that, as of the time of filing, (a) it maintains a certain level of economic activity within the United States in connection with the asserted intellectual property right, and (b) this economic activity is devoted to exploiting the intellectual property right at issue (in the case of a patent, at least one claim of the asserted patent). [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 9:19 am
International Trade Commission that a violation of § 337 of the 1930 Tarriff Act had not occurred. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 10:00 pm
ITC and Align Tech, the court has undertaken the definition of "articles"within Section 337. [read post]