Search for: "P. v. House"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 3,792
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2009, 6:09 am
You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:45 am
McGarvey worked at a low-income housing facility in Rock Springs. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 1:17 pm
Case Name: Dwan v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:24 am
On April 2, 2010, United States Magistrate Judge Barbara Major issued a decision which may end a two-year discovery battle about whether sanctions should be imposed on six attorneys in Qualcomm v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 6:08 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:21 pm
School Dist. v Moody’s, 175 F3d 848.), or by investors who suffered losses after their highly rated securities failed (Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank v Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. 651 F. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:12 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
"[O]ff-label use is generally accepted" and under the law, "[p]hysicians may prescribe drugs and devices for off-label uses." [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm
This is a claim articulated most fully (so far) by Justice Scalia in his brief concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:26 am
Farmers Insurance Exchange, 991 P. 2d 734 (Wash. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 11:32 am
District Judge Jennifer P. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 3:44 pm
Shea in Mucaj v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm
” Meanwhile, Article III vests the “judicial [p]ower” in the federal courts, “limit[ing] the authority of Congress to authorize an agency to adjudicate disputes involving the exercise of the judicial power. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm
Reserved Judgments George v Cannell, heard on 14 June 2022 (Underhill V-P, Warby and Snowden LLJ) The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspaper [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:05 am
AT & T Commc’ns, Inc., 875 F.2d 399 (2d Cir.1989) (“[P]rivate waiver of claims under the [FLSA] has been precluded by such Supreme Court decisions as Brooklyn Sav. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:39 am
Mintz, supra.The Superior Court went on to explain that[p]laintiffs filed their complaint on May 18, 2010. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 12:21 pm
In the case of Whiteside v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:41 pm
Cases that fall into this category include: where a defendant shoots into a house and ends up killing people with whom he has had a fight (People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
ANA SILVA YANEZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
