Search for: "PROPERTIES FOUR, INC. v. State" Results 1661 - 1680 of 1,989
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2009, 5:41 am by Susan Brenner
Haas Automation, Inc., 2009 WL 3818362 (U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by Don Cruse
Rehearing granted in the controversial Exxon well-plugging cases Exxon Corp. and Exxon Texas, Inc., No. 05-0729 (more info) Exxon Corp. and Exxon Texas, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 1:23 am
Finally, four weeks later, on May 20, the State Police arrested him. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Here is IP Think Tank's weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Here is IP Think Tank's weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:11 am
The Court, with two Justices not participating, also asked the Solicitor General to express views on Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has reached an agreement with Sunoco Inc. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 6:50 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:50 am
Here is IP Think Tank's weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:50 am
Here is IP Think Tank's weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
Finally, a Florida newspaper highlights the local context and nationwide implications of Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The City argued that under the Court's prior holding in Society of Plastics Industry, Inc. v County of Suffolk (77 NY2d 761 [1991]) that Petitioners lacked standing because the closest of them lives half a mile from the project. [read post]