Search for: "People v Levels (Robert)"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 1,684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2007, 4:43 pm
Industrial Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
In Robert Comer's case, his close friend, Robert Vickers, whom he had met on Arizona's death row, was executed in 1999. [read post]
15 May 2007, 8:26 am
The justices of the Supreme Court have historically included people who seemed, even during their service, to be genuine visionaries. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:18 am
Leroy Carhart in Gonzales v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:04 am
The court decided in People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
In Morris v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
Appeal from Johnson district court; PETER V. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:31 pm
It then applies the diagnostic lens of BOS to the claims in Roper v. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 11:00 pm
Circuit's recent decision in Parker v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:48 pm
It might be for the people, but it's not of the people or by the people. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
People bent on trumpeting the unity of the Roberts Court should avert their gaze now: three of the decisions split 5-4, with AMK joining the cons on 1 and the libs on 1. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 12:51 am
" Quoting Cotton v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Defendants have included people who have never even used a computer, and many people who although they have used a computer, have never engaged in any peer to peer file sharing.Sometimes the cases are misleadingly referred to as cases against 'downloaders'; in fact the RIAA knows nothing of any downloading when it commences suit, and in many instances no downloading ever took place.It is more accurate to refer to the cases as cases against persons who paid for internet… [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 5:42 pm
The wedge between the pharma/biotech/manufacturing and the software/electronics views of the patent world is on one level just a normal development in a vibrant and growing field. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:03 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 1:30 pm
Despite that decline, the number of criminal appeals in 2006 surpassed by more than 25% the number of filings in the years before the Court's decision in Blakely v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 8:45 pm
Booker and Blakely v. [read post]
11 Nov 2006, 9:16 am
" Singer v. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 7:50 am
In terms of raw candlepower, John Roberts is almost certainly one of the ten smartest people ever to sit on the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Oct 2006, 1:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
