Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
In the words of Lord Atkinson in Adam v.Ward [1917] AC 309 at 334. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 11:19 pm
Well, the Radmacher v Granatino case has certainly got family lawyers writing. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
It would be fair to say that the House of Lords judgment in the joined appeals in Birmingham v Ali and Moran v Manchester [2009] UKHL 36 has come as something of surprise. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
See Prince v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:45 am
A full report on Birmingham v Ali and Moran v Manchester [2009] UKL 36 will follow in due course, but for those of you who simply can’t wait for your fix of House of Lords homelessness judgments, the headline is that both appeals are allowed to limited extents. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:49 am
"do people still use Dictaphones" - Yes, unfortunately. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 8:42 pm
He cites Lord Scarman's views expressed in his opinion in R v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 3:30 am
(I will leave aside the problem created by the Schoon v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 10:10 am
Whilst the test of “necessity” under s.1(1)(b) Crime and Disorder Act 1998, is one of judgment (Lord Steyn in R (McCann) v Manchester Crown Court [2002] UKHL 39; [2003] 1 AC 787) there would be nothing wrong with giving courts some guidance as to when it would be appropriate to consider exercising that judgment, or the procedure to be adopted. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
31 May 2009, 11:17 pm
CE, and more formally through the Tunjur people in the 14th c. [read post]
31 May 2009, 8:18 pm
CE, and more formally through the Tunjur people in the 14th c. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:41 am
In Nicaragua v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:52 pm
Yes, criminal defendants are going to lose some too -- like Michigan v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 7:51 am
Let's go back to 1895 and the Supreme Court decision in Coffin v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 12:00 am
There is no evidence as to why people took licences. [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:59 pm
In the related context of private education, the Supreme Court has found a compelling interest in racial equality that overrides claims under the Free Exercise Clause (Bob Jones Univ. v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 9:40 am
It's for the people of Scotland. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:36 pm
Another deficient ground for toleration, given by Green, can be found in Justice Thomas' dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
