Search for: "People v. Fell"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 2,577
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2020, 12:26 pm
In Hart v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 7:08 am
In Abrams v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:27 am
“The decision in Elk v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 10:11 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:36 am
The appellate court in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am
Both the Bush and Obama administrations construed the 2002 AUMF to provide the domestic legal authority for armed conflict against Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq, and for military force against armed militia groups that sought to drive U.S. forces out of Iraq after the regime fell.14 I personally do not believe the 2001 AUMF covers armed conflict against ISIS in Iraq and Syria, or, as some have argued, that the 2002 AUMF for Iraq can be stretched to have justified lethal force… [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 8:28 am
The case is Aday et al. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 10:43 pm
In the case, Kindig v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 12:01 am
(Krugman points out that, in the Great Depression, the monetary base doubled while prices fell 19%.) [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:35 am
Then to make the week complete, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 9:12 pm
Ferris Trust v Planning Commission of the County of Kau’ai, 138 Hawai’i 307 (HI App. 8/9/16)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Non-Conforming Uses, Uncategorized [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:31 pm
The Supreme Court ruled in 2002 in Atkins v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:02 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:42 am
The Tribunal highlighted that Mr Hussein was put under investigation in relation to a limited number of chats which took place over a short period and was concerned by Counsel for the FCA’s observations that “as regards more senior people… not everybody is in the jurisdiction” and that “the senior people somehow manage to keep their fingerprints off the relevant documents sometimes”. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:12 am
Supreme Court case, O’Connor v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 1:17 pm
The case is Reilly v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:42 pm
” United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 5:13 am
The High Court agreed in R (Harrison) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin) that the current lack of provision for legal humanist weddings in England and Wales was in breach of Article 9 ECHR. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:45 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:21 pm
Frye v. [read post]
