Search for: "People v. Martin" Results 1661 - 1680 of 1,825
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge),  (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
” and was put on by Martin Jones (Many thanks for the help remembering “M. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 4:52 am
She also took on Courtney Martin, who blogs at feministing and is the author of Perfect Girls, Starving Daughters. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 4:02 pm
Apparently Wandsworth are very very unhappy with the Court of Appeal judgment in Wandsworth v Randall on underoccupation possessions via ground 16 HA 1985. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:48 pm
As Marlene Martin, executive director of the Campaign to End the Death Penalty says, "I think of people like Troy Davis, Rodney Reed and Timothy McKinney -- all on death row, all African American, all poor and almost all surely innocent. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
"  I'll hand them out as prizes to people who renew a two-year subscription to my blog. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
Gravante, the attorney who represented Frank Esposito in People v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Martin, No. 06-5605 A conviction and sentence for drug- and firearm-related offenses is affirmed primarily where the district court's permitting a police officer to testify as both an expert and a fact witness, without the issuance of a cautionary instruction to the jury, did not constitute reversible error under US v. [read post]