Search for: "People v. New" Results 1661 - 1680 of 41,441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2023, 8:09 am by Eric Goldman
US * New Civil FOSTA Lawsuits Push Expansive Legal Theories Against Unexpected Defendants (Guest Blog Post) * Section 230 Helps Salesforce Defeat Sex Trafficking Lawsuit–Doe v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 3:10 pm by COWS
This post was written by Nate Ela, of COWS If you were following news earlier this week about the end of the Supreme Court term, you probably read that Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 9:02 am by Jay A. Fernandez
Justin is co-lead plaintiff in a first-of-its-kind class-action lawsuit, Justin v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 11:00 am by Catherine Sanders Reach
With all these people using the product it was inevitable that we would see some misuse, including the recent “Zoom Bomb” issues. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:10 pm
The New York Court of Appeals – the state’s highest court -is about to consider an important property rights case, Goldstein v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:58 pm
Indignant Indigent points to People v Havrish from the New York Court of Appeals which holds that "In complying with an order of protection that directed him to turn over his firearms to police, defendant produced an unlicensed handgun and was subsequently charged with criminal possession of a weapon... [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 5:50 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Chuanju Cheng, Securing the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: The Case of Taiwan and Hunting Kimberly Theidon, Guerrilla Governance: Troubling Gender in the FARC Douglas Pretsell & Timothy Willem Jones, How Human Rights Became Gay Rights: A History of Toonen v Australia Jenna Norosky & Charli Carpenter, The Right to Flee the Dangers of War: Rethinking Ukraine’s Gender-Based Restriction on Civilian Men’s Freedom of Movement Juan Pablo… [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 8:05 am
Byers; and Ice and Water: Politics, Peoples, and the Arctic Council, by John English George H. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]