Search for: "People v. Richard"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 3,643
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm
” The announcement of this new rule comes on the heels of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Texas Dept. of Housing Community Affairs v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 11:45 am
Over the past few days, the Syrian government has repeatedly conducted airstrikes northeast of Aleppo, killing over 60 people. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 7:22 am
As I read the dissents I kept thinking about the 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 2:19 pm
Richard Gold of McGill University has commented that "some IP is good, but that the brand name pharmaceutical demands, as represented in the leaked TPP draft, go far, far beyond this. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:17 am
My first thought, upon reading the opinion, was to wonder why the Court did not base its holding more on the Equal Protection Clause, like Judge Richard Posner did in his opinion in Baskin v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
How to lose both your two trade marks and still come out on top ...The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd [2015] EWHC 1773 (IPEC), is a recent decision of Judge Richard Hacon in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:11 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Glossip v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:52 am
” At ACSblog, Charlotte Garden discusses Friedrichs v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am
He preferred the approach of Richards LJ in R (C) who had also thought Wood was over-rigid and had been overtaken by Strasbourg database cases (such as Marper v UK) in which REP was not used as a litmus. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
He preferred the approach of Richards LJ in R (C) who had also thought Wood was over-rigid and had been overtaken by Strasbourg database cases (such as Marper v UK) in which REP was not used as a litmus. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:24 am
The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd [2015] EWHC 1773 (IPEC), a 29 June decision of Judge Richard Hacon in the increasingly impressive and cost-effective Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, is impressive not only in its length (123 paragraphs) but also for the fact that the court was able to deal with so many legal and evidential issues in just two hearing days. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
(e) He corruptly sells privileged access to himself to a select group which included business people and business lobbyists in return for donations to the Liberal Party. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:24 am
Glossip v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:37 am
There is no easy answer, and that conundrum is what produced a legitimate 5-to-4 divide," writes lawprof Richard Pildes in a NYT op-ed about the opinion in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:37 am
I couldn't even reach the barf bags...Fortunately my zen-like focus quelled the queasiness, and I made an otherwise uneventful landing, and I actually felt quite fine on final approach.And yesterday the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed SB 863's imposition of a lien activation fee in Angelotti Chiropractic v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Richard Craswell’s work on this is excellent. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 am
Richards "Ever since Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
More specifically, those taking this positon cite Richard Nixon, not Harry Blackmun in writing Roe, as the villain. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:00 pm
As Richard already observed today, in King v. [read post]
