Search for: "People v. Shorts" Results 1661 - 1680 of 8,416
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2019, 7:36 am
The “S” Word: A Short History of an American Tradition ... [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:00 am by Anonymous
”Impact of This CaseIn short, the ruling in favor of Citizens United stated that there is no limit on what corporations and labor unions can spend on convincing people to vote for or against a candidate. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 7:56 am by Michael Risch
This argument is at the heart of a short essay I am publishing in the Florida L. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by David Kopel
To some people, the masculinization of mixed plurals seems unfair. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
As a result of the product's short time in the marketplace, one of the primary hurdles for Plaintiff may be timing. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:11 am
Rather, a multi-stage thought process would be necessary: 1) respondent’s wine has a higher alcohol content; 2) drinking fortified wine may make one inebriated; 3) inebriated people act inappropriately; 4) people who act inappropriately may be considered naughty; 5) NAUGHTY GIRL describes the result on the drinker of using the wine. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 3:12 pm
 That's just over 31 people for each Nice Class. [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 7:15 am by Unknown
Short pieces: 7 years into the conflict, solutions to displacement in Cabo Delgado remain elusive (IDMC Expert Analysis, Oct. 2024) [text] M23 conflict caused nearly 3 out of every 4 displacements in the DRC this year (IDMC Expert Analysis, Sept. 2024) [text] Refugee Creativity, Fun, and Initiative at Dzaleka Refugee Camp in Malawi (Wilson Center, Oct. 2024) [text] New open access book: Voices in the Dark: The Energy… [read post]
9 May 2017, 11:45 am
In short, New York’s broken public defense system has devoured lives and fueled mass incarceration. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:27 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case involves the interpretation of a little-known federal statute intended to protect public artistic endeavors.The case is Kerson v. [read post]