Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 3,634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2016, 4:56 am
Casper Sleep, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Superior Court, a California Court of appeals case, to posit that state law determines whether copyright may be claimed in works of state and local government. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am
Canada On 1 June 2023, the Superior Court of Justice Divisional Court handed down judgment in Corion v Plummer, 2023 ONSC 3249. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:30 am
(People v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 9:35 am
San Bernardino County Superior Court (stingray transparency) [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
A recent Appellate Division decision, State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
The Ontario Court of Appeal has opened a Pandora’s box by recognizing a privacy tort of “intrusion upon seclusion,” says one intellectual property lawyer.In Jones v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:53 am
In Focht v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
” In other news, on Wednesday the Court will hear oral arguments in Zubik v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 6:32 am
Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:01 am
In a recent decision – Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:01 am
In a recent decision – Commonwealth v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 5:46 pm
Last spring, I published a short essay about the relationship between the entry-ban litigation and Korematsu v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:43 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:01 am
Li published a remarkable opinion piece last week, entitled Why China’s Political Model Is Superior. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
Li published a remarkable opinion piece last week, entitled Why China’s Political Model Is Superior. [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:43 am
A resident superior court judge for the county in which the defendant was convicted performs the review. [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:43 am
A resident superior court judge for the county in which the defendant was convicted performs the review. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
Supreme Court held in Lefkowitz v Turley, 414 US 70, when a public employee is compelled to answer questions or face removal if he or she refuses to do so, the responses are cloaked with immunity automatically, and neither the compelled statements nor their fruits may be used against the employee in a subsequent criminal prosecution.Other decisions addressing the issue of requiring an individual to answer "job-related" question include Garner v Broderick, 392 US… [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
’ (People v. [read post]
