Search for: "People v. Wear"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 2,638
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
Cohen was prosecuted under a general ban on “disturb[ing] the peace” through “offensive conduct,” id. at 16 & n.1, conduct that consisted of wearing a jacket that contained a vulgarity. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:13 pm
Once again the focus of the lecture was on litigants in landmark twentieth-century cases – this time, the petitioners in the 1969 case Tinker v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:48 pm
In Monday’s argument in Sandifer v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:33 pm
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting question, which Carver v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 12:30 am
Deliberations continue today in State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Just watch out when one of us starts blogging about dead people. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 7:11 am
Reply Brief Filed in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court absolutely got it right in Employment Div. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:15 pm
See, People v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence was to have had a hearing today on proposed reforms to the NSA surveillance programs. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Facts of Navarette v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:28 am
Vallee rendered judgment in Nakhuda v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 8:37 am
” Tinker v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 2:05 pm
., Jr. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:14 am
[DealBook / New York Times] * DLA Piper’s future’s so bright it’s got to wear shades — and appoint a new co-managing partner in New York City, its largest office. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:43 am
The case, Ter Beek v City of Wyoming, involves the legal challenge brought by a card-carrying pot smoker against his hometown for an ordinance that was passed in response to the MMA.The challenged Wyoming ordinance subjects people to a violation for possessing marijuana on the basis of the federal prohibition of marijuana as a Schedule I drug, as set forth in the federal Controlled Substance Act. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:20 am
He commented on the court’s commitment to quality, and the fact that a number of cases heard by the UKSC over the past year have been of considerable public interest (referring in particular to R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another, Local Government Byelaws (Wales) Bill 2012 – Reference by the Attorney General and Bank Mellat v HM Treasury). [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:41 am
Rational Connection Test : Does regulating what people wear really achieve the objective of state neutrality? [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 10:32 am
(See Atkins v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 9:08 am
See Atlantic Records v. [read post]
