Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 178,347
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
., the court affirmed the Magistrate Judge’s order which excused plaintiff from having to review and produce millions of pages of documents recovered from unallocated space files due to the extreme burden and cost to do so. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 3:47 pm
However, the Court criticized the plaintiffs’ theory of recovery, asserting the plaintiffs were unable to cite authority suggesting that a doctor’s duty to provide competent medical care requires entities that employ doctors to charge an unspecified reasonable fee. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 3:47 pm
However, the Court criticized the plaintiffs’ theory of recovery, asserting the plaintiffs were unable to cite authority suggesting that a doctor’s duty to provide competent medical care requires entities that employ doctors to charge an unspecified reasonable fee. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 6:37 am
§ 1927, and this Court’s inherent authority. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 7:14 am
Finally, the court explained that the plaintiffs’ expert’s testimony was not sufficient to state a prima facie claim. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 1:02 am
Accordingly, in my view, Plaintiff is entitled to ad-interim relief also on the ground of infringement of copyright of Plaintiff's literary work in relation to programme titled "Work in Progress". [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 9:13 am
Thus, the plaintiff’s case will proceed to trial. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:15 am
Plaintiffs in the Florida suit claim that BMW violated that state's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, which protects consumers from unfair and deceptive acts or practices in trade or commerce. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 3:30 am
Over on “The D&O Diary,” Kevin LaCroix points out that the plaintiffs’ bar has also been watching. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:01 am
Plaintiffs alleged that Swiss Financial never independently verified Lancelot’s assets and thus failed to uncover the fact that Lancelot had no assets. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 6:00 am
July 12, 2021)Delaware courts generally do not award special compensation to lead plaintiffs in class action litigation. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:00 am
Here, Plaintiff’s experts did not, as they were likely unable, to opine that Garlock’s gaskets were a substantial factor in causing Mr. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 6:25 am
The plaintiffs argue that, if the court were to accept Wells Fargo’s arguments in their motion to exclude, the only expert that would be qualified to testify in this case would be an insider employed by a financial services entity. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 10:00 pm
Pechman ruled that the defendants’ did not waive their attorney-client privilege on the computer of one of the defendants purchased by plaintiffs at public auction, denied the defendants’ motion to disqualify the plaintiff’s counsel for purchasing the computer and ordered the plaintiffs to provide defendants with a copy of the hard drive within three days for the defendants to review it for privilege and provide defendants with a privilege log… [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
While the decision engages in a fact-specific analysis of many aspects of AIM ImmunoTech’s advance notice bylaws, two provisions in particular have been seized upon by the plaintiffs’ class action bar as “low hanging fruit” by which they may extract attorney fees based on the purported benefit conferred when the plaintiffs’ lawyers point out (in a litigation demand, books and records demand, or complaint filed in court) that a… [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
While the decision engages in a fact-specific analysis of many aspects of AIM ImmunoTech’s advance notice bylaws, two provisions in particular have been seized upon by the plaintiffs’ class action bar as “low hanging fruit” by which they may extract attorney fees based on the purported benefit conferred when the plaintiffs’ lawyers point out (in a litigation demand, books and records demand, or complaint filed in court) that a… [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
While the decision engages in a fact-specific analysis of many aspects of AIM ImmunoTech’s advance notice bylaws, two provisions in particular have been seized upon by the plaintiffs’ class action bar as “low hanging fruit” by which they may extract attorney fees based on the purported benefit conferred when the plaintiffs’ lawyers point out (in a litigation demand, books and records demand, or complaint filed in court) that a… [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
While the decision engages in a fact-specific analysis of many aspects of AIM ImmunoTech’s advance notice bylaws, two provisions in particular have been seized upon by the plaintiffs’ class action bar as “low hanging fruit” by which they may extract attorney fees based on the purported benefit conferred when the plaintiffs’ lawyers point out (in a litigation demand, books and records demand, or complaint filed in court) that a… [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
While the decision engages in a fact-specific analysis of many aspects of AIM ImmunoTech’s advance notice bylaws, two provisions in particular have been seized upon by the plaintiffs’ class action bar as “low hanging fruit” by which they may extract attorney fees based on the purported benefit conferred when the plaintiffs’ lawyers point out (in a litigation demand, books and records demand, or complaint filed in court) that a… [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
While the decision engages in a fact-specific analysis of many aspects of AIM ImmunoTech’s advance notice bylaws, two provisions in particular have been seized upon by the plaintiffs’ class action bar as “low hanging fruit” by which they may extract attorney fees based on the purported benefit conferred when the plaintiffs’ lawyers point out (in a litigation demand, books and records demand, or complaint filed in court) that a… [read post]
