Search for: "Reach v. State" Results 1661 - 1680 of 37,342
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Cunniff states the report’s bottom line as follows: “After an objective analysis, the reviewer concluded that the Sagadahoc County Sheriff’s Office’s responses to concerns about Mr. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 10:53 am by Dennis Crouch
  The UK Supreme court based its holding upon the text of the UK Patents Act of 1977 as it reached the same ultimate conclusion as the Federal Circuit in Thaler v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 3:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2022) Having found the dispute over the ’562 patent moot, the court next considered the proper disposition—whether to simply dismiss the appeal or also vacate the PTAB decision under United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm by Orin S. Kerr
  It reached that ruling in cases that happened to involve a sniff of luggage and a sniff around a car. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm by CFM Admin
State-registered advisers need to examine their states’ regulations to determine who constitutes a “client. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 9:36 am by David Pozen
More recently, David Super has emerged as the academy’s leading critic of the “Convention of States” campaign and of Article V convention drives in general. [read post]