Search for: "SIERRA CLUB" Results 1661 - 1680 of 1,734
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2007, 9:18 am
This is especially smart because unlike, say, the Sierra Club, KQED is part of your life. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:00 am
" To illustrate the first, a visit to the Defenders of Wildlife's arctic webpage reveals a collage of fuzzy friends.[14] An even more blatant example of the second can be found on the home page of the Sierra Club (probably the most influential of environmental groups). [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 12:21 am
  That is the question raised by the Hawaii Supreme Court's opinion in the "Hawaii Superferry EIS case," Sierra Club v. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 1:27 am
  On one hand, as reported by the Star-Bulletin here, it seems straightforward that the DOT's decision to "carry out or approve" the EA exemption occurred more than 120 days before the Kauai lawsuit:In 2005, when the Transportation Department exempted the Hawaii Superferry from the Environmental Assessment process, the Maui Chapter of the Sierra Club filed a challenge. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 6:05 am
§ 343-7(a):The plaintiffs seemed to view themselves as essentially in the same position as the Sierra Club in its recent successful injunction motion on Maui. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 2:51 pm
" * * * Hank Graddy, a Midway attorney who represented the Sierra Club and others in the Thoroughbred case, said the state is exaggerating the ruling's impact. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 6:52 am
On August 27, 2007,  Earthjustice submitted comments on behalf of the Environmental Integrity Project and the Sierra Club to the EPA’s proposed New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Petroleum Refineries (72 Fed. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 7:52 pm
  Opening Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants [Sierra Club, Maui Tomorrow, Kahului Harbor Coalition] (filed Oct. 21, 2005) (2 mb pdf) Defendants-Appellees Hawaii Superferry, Inc. and the State of Hawaii's Answering Brief (filed Dec 27, 2005) (1.2 mb pdf) Reply Brief of Appellants (filed Jan. 20, 2006) (650 kb pdf) Update: Charley Foster at Planet Kauai has posted a succinct summary of the briefs and the legal arguments, and included some thoughts about the future:The… [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 11:51 am
Until the Supreme Court actually decides an issue, we should follow our circuit's decisions concerning statutory interpretation, and under that law he has a valid claim of innocence.In Sierra Club v. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 9:15 am
Many have defended NARAL, Sierra Club and others for their endorsement of Chafee based on one or two actions by Chafee yesterday or today and have not considered what keeping Chafee means for tomorrow. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 5:49 am
Also, the Sierra Club cites the risks of LNG operations, evidenced by an  incident  in 2006 when an LNG carrier broke away from its mooring, though no LNG was spilled. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 3:54 pm
The Hawaii Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the Sierra Club's challenge to the "Hawaii Superferry" on August 23, 2007 at 9 am. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 6:18 am
" * * * Landlocked residents of Central Indiana just don't have an appreciation for the importance of keeping Lake Michigan clean, said Jack Darin, director of the Illinois chapter of the Sierra Club, an environmental group. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 2:55 pm
For this reason, Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction must be DENIED.The ILB has posted the 57-page ruling in the case of The Sierra Club, et al v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 6:52 am
Then the project was shelved, said Albert Ettinger, who represented the Sierra Club in the rulemaking process. * * * Ettinger said another big problem with BP's permit is that it allows the company to dilute pollution through a diffuser at the bottom of the lake rather than removing it before discharge. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 12:34 pm
"The EPA decided to give them blanket amnesty in the form of, 'You send us a check ... and we'll guarantee that no one will sue you,'" said David Bookbinder, senior attorney for the Sierra Club. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 10:11 pm
Bad, bad news: By 6-1 vote, California high court invalidates recreational risk waivers in cases where plaintiffs allege gross negligence; Sierra Club had weighed in for defense [decision; L.A. [read post]