Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 41,372
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
NetChoice v. [read post]
Don’t Judge a Range by its Cover: Federal Circuit Sides with Patentee on Written Description Support
11 Feb 2024, 9:43 am
RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 11:12 pm
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 10:28 pm
That day, a motion was made to add "[t]he [V]ice-President and other Civil officers of the U. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
A parent who only exercises some parenting time still has the power to stymie a child’s move by refusing to sign the notice of relocation. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
In Guerra v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:29 pm
The underlying case, Nairne v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
There was a tension in yesterday's oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
” Sotomayor asked why states should have the power to remove candidates from their ballots, to which Murray explained that Article II gives states the power to “appoint their own electors as they see fit. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:45 pm
University of South Florida Board of Trustees v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm
Roberts (Cumberland; Google Scholar) reviews new works by Conor Clarke (Washington University; Google Scholar), Moore: The Overlooked Excise Power, 181 Tax Notes Fed. 1759 (Dec. 4, 2023) and Reuven Avi-Yonah (Michigan; Google Scholar), Effects from Moore: Does the Corporate Tax Require Realization, 182 Tax Notes Fed.... [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:08 am
Co v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:24 am
” As stated by Justice Rehnquist in his concurring opinion in Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
In 2012, the case of Louboutin v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
He has had a bumpy ride of late, what with the leak of the decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:56 am
On Wednesday, in State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am
We argue that state election officials, courts, and presidential electors all have the responsibility to faithfully apply Section Three's constitutional disqualification rule, each within the sphere of its respective powers and duties under state or federal law. [read post]
