Search for: "Securities Co. v. United States" Results 1661 - 1680 of 3,796
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2017, 7:01 am by Charlotte Garden
Even in a term in which the eight-member court seems to be going out of its way to avoid high-profile disputes, there is a remarkable degree of consensus among the various players involved in McLane Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm by eorozco
Background on Forms 13F and 13H Under Exchange Act Section 13(f)(1), institutional investment managers that use the United States mail (or other means or instrumentality of interstate commerce) in the course of their business and that exercise investment discretion over $100 million or more in Section 13(f) securities may be required to file quarterly reports listing such securities positions on SEC Form 13F.[2] Section 13(f) securities are defined as… [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeClient Is Uncooperative But Lawyer Must ContinueRepresentation; Problems Not Personal to Counsel United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2024, 11:42 pm by Robin Verma
V oss on Delaware Contract Law Delaware contract law frequently governs the formation, interpretation, and enforcement of high-stakes commercial agreements throughout the United States; it also underpins the nation’s predominant corporation and business entities laws. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 11:03 am
Petersburg, Florida, $2.75 million for failing to maintain adequate supervisory system to oversee the sales activities of over one thousand of its branch managers working throughout the United States. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:05 am by JB
Both are fully available to the United States, and, moreover, the United States is currently employing them. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The rates of maternal mortality are highest in the United States among wealthy industrialized countries. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
Croson Co., the Court struck down the City of Richmond’s minority and female-owned business program as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]