Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 23,629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 12:36 pm
The recent federal antitrust case of Federal Trade Commission and State of Idaho, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 6:46 pm
Greenwood 950, L.L.C. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
In Luis v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 8:48 am
., v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 10:31 pm
Talbert v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 1:03 pm
The US Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in Henry Schein Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 7:46 am
Janine Cox won in State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:31 am
Above The Law -“…In DR Distributors, LLC v. 21 Century Smoking, Inc., originally filed in 2012, two companies that sell electronic cigarettes brought suit and counterclaims alleging, among other things, trademark violations under the Lanham Act. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:11 pm
CoxCom, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 8:57 am
The decision in Euro-Excellence v Kraft has just been released; it’s a dispute over copyright in logos as a method of restraining unauthorised distribution of chocolate bars (Toblerones) in Canada. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 11:45 pm
Via scotusblog: The Court has released the opinion in Hawaii, et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:01 am
Silver Ring Splint Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 6:13 am
Circuit Court of appeals has ruled that Google must face a trademark infringement lawsuit for selling keywords that trigger ads. [read post]
20 May 2009, 8:52 pm
See Feesers, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm
NLRB to brass: please don’t sell workplace data to telemarketers or use it to “harass” or “rob” employees [Joe Perticone, IJ Review] “Direct evidence must … wait for it … exist to matter in a discrimination case” [Jon Hyman on Butler v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 3:01 am
[Steven Boranian/Drug & Device Law, PLF on T.H. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:17 pm
The plaintiffs in Torres v. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 5:26 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:17 pm
The plaintiffs in Torres v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:38 am
Ramchandani v. [read post]