Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 4,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
When should this "actual v abstract" test take place and on the basis of what criteria? [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:53 am
Case citation: Selden v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
On the same day there was an application in the case of Holyoake & Anor v Candy & Ors before Warby J. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 7:58 am
A recent case, Deschamps v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
The Supreme Court’s consideration of these issues (and of the impact of s 377 on personal autonomy and privacy in general) on appeal in Koushal v Naz Foundation (“Koushal”) was notoriously cursory, as explored by Sheikh and Narrain.[1]The complex interplay between formal criminalisation, a lack of reported prosecutions and societal stigma is reflected both in the sharp disparity between Naz Foundation and Koushal’s treatment of s 377 and to diverse,… [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
The Supreme Court’s consideration of these issues (and of the impact of s 377 on personal autonomy and privacy in general) on appeal in Koushal v Naz Foundation (“Koushal”) was notoriously cursory, as explored by Sheikh and Narrain.[1]The complex interplay between formal criminalisation, a lack of reported prosecutions and societal stigma is reflected both in the sharp disparity between Naz Foundation and Koushal’s treatment of s 377 and to diverse,… [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 6:09 am
OrthoAccel Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
On the same day Sharp LJ refused the application for permission to appeal in the case of Theedom v Nourish Training. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 10:33 am
As the U.K. government prepares itself for the beginning of Brexit negotiations in March 2017, it is becoming increasingly clear that there is no off-ramp—and, for that matter, no brakes on the car. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:14 pm
" They use sharp instruments and make neat cuts. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm
Truly a landmark case, Fletcher v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 7:03 am
Board of Regents of the Univ. of Houston Sys. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 5:13 am
” Such discussion “may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 11:25 am
§§ 43:21-19(i)(6)(A) – (C); Hargrove v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 11:25 am
§§ 43:21-19(i)(6)(A) – (C); Hargrove v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 6:56 pm
Gonzalez v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 6:56 pm
Gonzalez v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
In Nicodemus v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 9:02 am
His retaliation claim was also rejected.In Sharps v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 2:52 pm
In Matter of Shanika M. v. [read post]
