Search for: "Shields v. State"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 5,102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2019, 4:01 am
Retaliation against an employee for reporting improper governmental action prohibited by Civil Service Law §75-b, the "Whistleblower Statute"Lilley v Greene Cent. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-9378, Shields v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 4:54 pm
In Rosenbach v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
M.H. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
M.H. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
M.H. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:07 am
” For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that by agreeing to hear the New York gun case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:19 am
In Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 11:45 am
A coalition of 14 state Attorneys General and the D.C. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:11 am
In Thacker v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:08 pm
The court relied on a recent decision from the Supreme Court of the United States, Kokesh v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:46 am
Frymier v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
Privacy Shield. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
On December 28, 2018, the Court in The California Institute of Technology v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:32 am
” An important and often-used litigation defense for manufacturers, impossibility pre-emption doctrine shields manufacturers from state liability when it would be impossible for them to comply both with FDA regulations and with state-law duties to warn. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:51 am
” In 1984, in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 8:29 am
* Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
Weeks and Tenney v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:00 am
There was the abrupt announcement of “mission accomplished” against the Islamic State in Syria and the decision to withdrawal substantial forces from Afghanistan, contrary to advice from senior military commanders and to the surprise of most of Congress. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
Lopez v. [read post]
