Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 1661 - 1680 of 12,650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2023, 12:15 am
Last week, I wrote about an unsuccessful challenge to the activities of the Office of Elections Cybersecurity within the California Secretary of State's office: Is The California Secretary of State Monitoring What You Publish Online? [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm by Brian Fong
Nordstrom removed the case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, and Gordon subsequently intervened. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 8:27 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Last fall, a panel of the Seventh Circuit handed down Exodus Refugee Immigration, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  But we believe that United States Supreme Court has spoken on the issue, and we are required to follow its binding authority. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:42 pm
We're all used to the United States Supreme Court and its fractured political composition, which in turn generates lots of dissents -- and often somewhat vitriolic ones, at that. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 10:43 am by Rory Little
United States; see my preview), the question presented in the second case (United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:39 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:59 am by Marcela Knaup
The law at issue "Legal Arizona Workers Act" mandates that private employers use federal E-Verify program to establish if a person is authorized to work in the United States. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm
(“WildTangent”), in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Kali Borkoski
United States, holding that increasing sentences under the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act violates the Constitution, and Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:50 am
This is not a bankruptcy case, but it will be applicable in many large bankruptcy cases involving allegations of fraud by shareholders or investors.On January 15, 2008, the United States Supreme Court entered an important decision in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:30 am by Kori Shafer-Stack
  Following appeal of the case by both parties, the Ninth Circuit United States Court of Appeals upheld the constitutionality of the lien activation fees on June 29, 2015. [read post]