Search for: "State v. Battle"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 7,541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
In Dunn v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 7:30 am
Indeed, in Meyer v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:30 am
In the June 8, 2015 ruling in Hill v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 7:54 am
Do you remember Zarda v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:29 pm
This unanimous decision in Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 11:13 pm
And the circumstances surrounding the "Marshall v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 12:30 pm
Back in April, Jeffrey wrote that Antoine Jones wasn't off the hook for his crimes because of the ruling in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 2:27 pm
United States on Monday. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:45 pm
On Monday, December 6, the Ninth Circuit will hear oral arguments in Perry v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 12:30 pm
Back in April, Jeffrey wrote that Antoine Jones wasn't off the hook for his crimes because of the ruling in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:29 am
In Luri v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:39 am
Additional Resources: Cromer v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 9:27 pm
This is in turn forced me to consider why would it be useful, for example, to discuss or even mention the Apple V Samsung global IP battle or the Laboutin appeal decision or the latest decisions on the Harmonisation Directive? [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:13 am
See the uncited Ascentive v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am
Yesterday the justices heard argument in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:32 pm
He argued Howell v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 5:37 am
Though CICAD was carrying out its statutory role of battling anti-Semitism, exercising Article 10 rights carries with it the duty to ensure that value judgments have a sufficient factual basis. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 10:40 am
MacLean v. [read post]
