Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 1661 - 1680 of 15,315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2019, 6:47 am by Natalma M. McKnew
Application of Dynamex’s A-B-C employment test to the franchise model will likely result in most franchisors being deemed the employer of its California franchisees’ employees. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 7:27 am
(e) Technical and Conforming Amendments- (1) SECTION 114- Section 114(f) of title 17, United States Code (as amended by subsection (b) of this section), is further amended– (A) in paragraph (1)(B), in the first sentence, by striking `paragraph (3)’ and inserting `paragraph (2)’; and (B) in paragraph (4)(C), by striking `under paragraph (4)’ and inserting `under paragraph (3)’. (2) SECTION 804- Section… [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:05 am by Gregory B. Williams
July 20, 2020), the Court denied in part and granted in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s fifteen (15) count complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm by Orin Kerr
UPDATE: I have now posted the opinions, and here’s a quick run-down: (a) Judge Sentelle’s dissent argues that GPS surveillance is directly covered by the Supreme Court’s beeper case, United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
” [Complaint, paragraph 16.]In a Memorandum filed on December 20, 2022, Sholopa’s counsel advised the court of a proposed settlement of the claims, on a classwide basis, with the class members to be defined as:“[A]ll United States residents who purchased tickets for travel on a Turkish flight scheduled to operate to, from, or within the United States between the Class Period (a) whose flights were cancelled by Turkish, (b) the customer did not… [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
” [Complaint, paragraph 16.]In a Memorandum filed on December 20, 2022, Sholopa’s counsel advised the court of a proposed settlement of the claims, on a classwide basis, with the class members to be defined as:“[A]ll United States residents who purchased tickets for travel on a Turkish flight scheduled to operate to, from, or within the United States between the Class Period (a) whose flights were cancelled by Turkish, (b) the customer did not… [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (C) Secretary of State for Work & Pensions, heard 10-11 Jul 2017. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 5:04 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In June, the Court held in Susan B. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 9:02 am by Paul E. Freehling
Fox, Case No. 14 C 8191 (N.D.Ill., June 1, 2015) (Holderman, J.), the court held that those allegations do not state a cause of action under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:10 am
According to the Government's proffer, six potential child exploitation victims have already been identified.U.S. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 5:57 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
McDermott – that case later became United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:24 am by Nico Cordes
In the present case, the notice of opposition stated that the opposition challenged the granted patent in its entirety and was based on the grounds for opposition under Article 100(a) EPC in combination with Articles 54 and 56 EPC, and under Article 100(b) EPC. [read post]