Search for: "State v. Dakota"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 2,221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2014, 10:02 pm
Three other states, North Dakota, Montana and Kansas, adopted the first generation of such measures during the 1990-91 legislative seasons. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Those states are Indiana, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, and South Dakota. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 10:15 am
” Since the US Supreme Court ruled that there is no constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]
Mayo Foundation v. U.S.: Supreme Court Brushes Off Medical Residents, Unsettles Agency Deference Law
13 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 7:19 am
Since the physical presence requirement from Quill has been struck down (in South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:28 am
He successfully argued on behalf of the Sac and Fox Nation in the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 8:40 am
The case is Tiemessen v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
Wallace v Conagra Foods Inc., 2014 WL 1356860 (8th Cir. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:30 pm
In particular, the company relied on Quill v North Dakota (1992) and said that there was no tax nexus that would be recognized under US Supreme Court jurisprudence on the matter. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 2:24 am
However, in a 2018 case called South Dakota v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:40 am
See NBTY, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 2:38 am
”, is to put pressure on the state legislature to make Arizona the 38th ratifying state to satisfy Article V of the Constitution. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:15 pm
It is somewhat surprising the court found it reasonable on its face, rather than remanding for the trial court to make such a determination.South Dakota: Home of the Black Hills, Custer State Park, and Wall Drug, one of my favorite states does not produce many competition decisions. [read post]
15 May 2018, 1:31 pm
The Facts of State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:36 pm
” District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:31 pm
” The Supreme Court had indicated that “coercive” conditional grants are unconstitutional as far back as the 1930s, and reiterated that point in South Dakota v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:08 pm
District Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle in her opinion in Spaeth v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
Tweedy University of South Dakota School of Law [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:16 am
That is how the challengers could so effectively argue that if the Medicaid expansion did not run afoul of South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
New York State Liquor Authority[15] involved a New York law under which liquor distillers could not sell to wholesalers in New York except in accordance with a monthly price schedule that affirmed that prices in New York were no higher than the lowest prices charged in other states.[16] Healy v. [read post]
