Search for: "State v. District Court (Brown)" Results 1661 - 1680 of 3,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Arguing that this practice leads to judges hesitant to make unpopular decisions, the former justice advocated for a universally merit-based system of judicial appointments, pointing out that landmark decisions like Brown v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:23 pm by Nathan Dorn
Hunter’s Lessee, and the United States v. the Amistad. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm by Jade Smarda
[xi] The employees were granted summary judgment, and Ohio’s First District Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:21 am by Russ Bensing
  The Griggs court follows Eskridge and a 1984 8th District decision, State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Catron 15-690Issue: Whether a district court may dismiss a removed action rather than remanding it to state court under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
When the Court accepted the case for argument, it expressly stated that it would consider only a procedural issue: whether the appeals court erred by denying the states’ efforts to intervene to challenge the district court’s grant of a summary judgment for the plaintiffs challenging Title 42. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:50 am by Annie H. Lee and Leonard L. Gordon
The district court judge granted both requests, and Brown was ordered to pay more than $5 million in restitution. [read post]
Remanded, with a note that the District Court could either continue to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, or could remand the case back to Ohio state court. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 1:56 pm
Brown could be facing charges in a number of countries; it remains to be seen, however, what future actions will be taken.[1] Susan Watts, Stem Cell Treatment Warning, BBC, Aug. 30, 2006.[2] Id.[3] Id.[4] Id.[5] See United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 1:11 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil PracticeProtective Order Granted in Putative Class Action Over Arrests Under Unconstitutional Panhandling Law Brown v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:14 pm by Mitchell Silverman
Supreme Court: “The central issue in this case is whether the people of the District of Columbia will be able to exercise their constitutional right to vote on this important issue, just as voters in 31 states have been able to do. [read post]