Search for: "State v. Files" Results 1661 - 1680 of 91,584
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2024, 6:21 am by Jonathan H. Adler
As initially filed, AHM sought to argue that the FDA wrongly approved mifepristone in the first place. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
   How one state's 2008 law has effectively curbed how face recognition technology is used there, perhaps creating a model for other states or Congress to follow. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
DIP Financing Key Terms Tracker State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Mega Chapter 11 Filings Tracker Subchapter V Decision Tracker Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Resource Kit is a frequently updated collection of current Practical Guidance materials on generative AI, ChatGPT, and similar tools. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 8:39 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
v=yz6vWTjLjuQ If you are going through the immigrant visa process and are waiting for your interview to be scheduled at a U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm by Amy Howe
” The challengers filed their lawsuit in Amarillo, Tex., where it was all but certain to be heard by Matthew Kacsmaryk, a conservative federal jurist there who, before becoming a judge, had written articles criticizing the court’s landmark decision in Roe v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:32 am by Ilya Somin
Some of the points made in the article are developed in greater detail in an amicus brief I recently filed in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:33 am by Unknown
Although most of the petitioners are business groups, individual companies affected by the SEC’s regulation, or conservative state attorneys general, two environmental groups, believing the SEC’s final regulation fell short of what had been proposed, also filed suit in the Second and D.C. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Pseudonymity may enhance the incentives for well-founded complaints to be filed, but it may also serv [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:58 am by Marcel Pemsel
Court of Justice of the EU, Bundesverband Souvenir - Geschenke - Ehrenpreise v EUIPO, C-488/16 P, at para. 38). [read post]