Search for: "State v. King" Results 1661 - 1680 of 5,436
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2023, 6:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Mrkulic v Peters 2023 NY Slip Op 33930(U) November 2, 2023Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 505025/2020Judge Debra Silber points out a vast number of errors that took place before she was assigned to the case. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 12:39 am
Amato NASSAU COUNTYLand Use and PlanningCourt Finds Claim for Unconstitutionally Vague Ordinance Is Stated by Vendor Party Magic Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
Alabama, 10-9085, in which the Court had previously requested the record, and King v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 1:54 am
  In DISMISSING the appeal, the Appellate Term, Second Department, stated: Here, defendant sought a protective order and the court denied its motion, affording plaintiff the full relief sought in opposition (see Atlantic Hudson Realty v Rhodes, 271 AD2d 558 [2000]). [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
Lord Keen QC does not agree. 14:42: Lord Keen QC says the example shows the proroguing of Parliament was in fact where the Government did not have support of the House rather than for a King’s/Queens speech. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:05 am by SHG
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has proposed what he delightfully calls the No Kings Act, the putative purpose of which is to reverse the Supreme Court’s presidential criminal immunity ruling in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 9:51 am
This result is different from that previously reached in the United States in the case of Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 6:42 am
Attorneys for Mayberry; Peter Campbell King, and Donna L. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 1:17 am
KINGS COUNTYCriminal Practice Defendant Ruled Not in Custody During Initial Pre-'Miranda' Statements; Suppression Denied People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:54 am by Jeff Gamso
  Back in 1999, when the Ohio Supremes affirmed his death sentence in State v. [read post]