Search for: "State v. L. B. T." Results 1661 - 1680 of 3,630
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2016, 7:14 am
Perkins Co., Div. of Standex Int'l Corp., 166 F.3d 642, 647 (U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:33 am by Eugene Volokh
but also because the “depends upon the meaning of ‘with’ ” question just came up in another sex case, this one a solicitation case from last Friday in Utah, State v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Silbey: one of the productive comparisons b/t Anita Allen’s and other work was that Allen discussed harm to individuals v. harm to systems or organizations. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:58 am by Phillips & Associates
The “L,” “G,” and “B” generally refer to a person’s preference in a romantic or sexual partner, not their identity. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Hacking into systems is the purview of the CFAA and state anti-hacking statutes. [read post]
17 May 2016, 10:42 am by John Chierichella
This rule is applied with equal force by the Court of Federal Claims, L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:44 am by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]