Search for: "State v. Land"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 13,213
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2016, 3:13 pm
Peck, cases on state bills of credit in the Jacksonian era, the Legal Tender cases, and Pollock v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:10 am
The Apology Resolution did not strip the state of its sovereign authority to alienate the lands the United States held in "absolute fee simple" and which were granted to the state upon its admission to the Union. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 9:02 pm
The idea was that the federal government has no business impressing a land use cookie cutter across the country.Starting with Village of Euclid v. [read post]
24 May 2008, 1:41 pm
Sand & Gravel v. [read post]
13 May 2017, 6:40 pm
Arnold v City of Stanley, 2017 WL 1968326 (ID 5/23/2017)Filed under: Jurisdiction [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 12:30 pm
The Appeals Court had a momentous decision to make in Killorin v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:59 am
Public Lands Council, et al. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:39 pm
In Matter of Wallach v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 11:05 am
An odd appeal on an adverse possession case, of no legal interest per se, but entertaining on the facts.Devanney v LB Hounslow [2012] EWCA Civ 1660 [not on baili yet. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 12:53 am
Judge freezes assets of Madoff figure Stanley Chais, LATimes.com, October 9, 2009 SIPC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:10 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Lambda Legal reports on the court's decision in Cervelli & Bufford v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:38 pm
The authors' summary: This Article examines how Washington State courts have allowed the precautionary principle to encroach upon the essential nexus test in the context of land use exactions. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 9:46 am
Evers (Indian Taxation; Treaty Rights) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlHarris v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 3:00 am
In Timbs v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:51 am
Boise Cascade Corp. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 9:28 am
Recently, the Indiana Supreme Court decided that a business that loses customer traffic due to a State highway expansion project is not entitled to compensation.1 In State of Indiana v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 9:08 am
Bernhardt (Land Into Trust)Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 7:04 am
Snyder (Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)Gwitchyaa Zhee Corporation v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:53 pm
T-Mobile South, LLC v. [read post]
