Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 21,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2007, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 6:06 am
Julius Sämman Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
Here is the abstract: New York Times v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:30 pm
§1927 (Ketab Corp. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:58 am
Further, the marks were visually dissimilar, and The Row Kitchen and Pub offered very little evidence to raise a genuine issue of material fact that the Whiskey Row mark created the likelihood of confusion (The Row, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
Rost v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:37 pm
In 1995, the opinion in the case Stratton-Oakmont v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 3:30 pm
The case is Osprey Ship Mgmt. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:29 pm
The oral argument transcript in Maples v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 12:46 pm
On February 22, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 9:13 am
A. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:26 pm
See Larry Harmon Picture Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:26 pm
See Larry Harmon Picture Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
(Mark L., 34 Cal.3d 171.) [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
(g) Patents, trade-marks, utility models and designs shall be deemed to be situated at the place where the trade, business or profession to which it pertains is carried on. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
[IPKat comment: 2 huge problems with this - (1) all these factors go towards showing that there's a link between the marks, but they don't really show that the link has 'rubbed off' on the later mark to give its owner an unfair advantage; (2) these are the factors that were used in relation to detriment to distinctive character, but the court has just said that these are two different types of harm; (3) the ECJ in Intel v CPM said such factors are… [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 8:01 pm
Stonite Products Co. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 11:07 am
Mark Hertsgaard has a piece in the Guardian examining US TV news lack of commentary on climate change stating- “its media malpractice not to mention that burning fossil fuels drives extreme weather events like Hurricane Ida”. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:56 am
In Montres Breguet SA v Samsung Electronics, the owners of Swatch (and various other watch brand trade marks), objected to Samsung providing third-party watch faces on their Galaxy App Store featuring Swatch’s marks (the “Marks”). [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Whatever your feelings about the doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales], it's a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
