Search for: "State v. Oxford"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 1,744
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 3:36 am
Louisiana:Kennedy's Footnote Buried in Justice Anthony Kennedy's majority opinion in Kennedy v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
: (Spicy IP), Aspen pays £170M for IP rights to Eltroxin, Imuran, Lanoxin and Zyloric: (Afro-IP), Year after settling global patent feud over smallpox vaccine, Barvarian Nordic sues Oxford BioMedica over patents related to same virus: (IP Law360), Australia: Age reports former GSK executive’s victory in court action brought by GSK alleging he started a competing business using GSK’s confidential information: (IPwar’s), Brazil: ANVISA to review… [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 4:51 pm
" Fashion Fabrics of Iowa v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
Malcom Read of JISC and Jude Carroll of Oxford Brookes University. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 10:43 am
In our correspondence, I used a phrase that seemed odd, on reflection, just after the decision in D.C. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary injunction… [read post]
30 May 2008, 7:25 am
Bolling v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:50 am
Thomas Schornhorst, Oxford, MS. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:57 am
See Oxford House-C v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 8:47 am
v=LJda5OJep_8). [read post]
4 May 2008, 5:52 am
Plan of Greater New York v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 8:38 am
The precedent is United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:45 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Newman, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 816 (18 April 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Mills v Birchall & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 385 (18 April 2008) Oxford Legal Group Ltd v Sibbasbridge Services Plc & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 387 (18 April 2008) Morgan v UPS Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 375 (17 April 2008) Strachey v Ramage [2008] EWCA Civ 384 (18 April 2008) Bonham & Anor v Fishwick &… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
What I mean is, you remember yesterday where I asked a bunch of questions about that story where Mike Moore said he got a text message from Lon Stallings debunking Judge Lackey's testimony in the Jones v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 8:32 am
Such is ICLB's Oxford correspondent, with the latest dispatch from the courtroom -- a default judgment was entered against the defendants as a sanction for improper conduct in the Jones v. [read post]
