Search for: "State v. Peoples"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 45,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2015, 6:39 am
Casey v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
2010 NY Slip Op 51103 The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:44 am
Since the Court of Appeals is the highest court in the state and its holdings as to state law are binding on lower courts, one would have thought that the Appellate Divisions would refrain from upholding the denial of suppression motions on the ground that standing had not been established when no such claim had been raised by the People in response to the motion. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
Board of Trustees of the California State University (2015) 239 Cal.App.4th 1258 (discussed here), Barker v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:18 am
In Rothchild v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:43 pm
People accused of crimes in the United States are afforded certain rights under the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 1:34 pm
Unfortunately, people across all those states will suffer from the lack of judicial protection for their access to health services. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:46 am
Indirect discrimination The policy did not put transgender people at a substantial disadvantage compared with cisgender people who were also subject to the policy [74]. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:21 am
People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:58 am
The Secretary of State disagreed. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:07 am
Last week in Bond v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
United States, in Trump v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 9:20 am
State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 6:56 am
Consequences of Worley v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
The relevant question was whether people whose disabilities resulted in a need (medical or social) for an additional room should be catered for by the Secretary of State in the Regulations, or through the “linked system” of DHPs (at [36]). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 12:07 pm
People v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 12:25 pm
People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
In her recent concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
