Search for: "State v. Poole" Results 1661 - 1680 of 2,928
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2008, 9:31 am
Currently, 7 Justices---all but Stevens and Alito---participate in a "cert pool," in which one law clerk writes a short memo for all 7 participating pool Justices. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 10:31 am
It would seem to me that for an advertisement to be an advertisement, it must be sent to the potential pool of customers. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:19 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
Lopez (1995) 514 U.S. 549) , and 2) a Federal civil lawsuit for nonconsensual sexual contact (United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 1:01 am by Florian Mueller
And some of what Huawei says is really interesting (this post continues below the document): 18-09-28 PanOptis v. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 8:17 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The system in Alberta was challenged on similar grounds in R. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm by John Elwood
  The enlarged pool of available photographers in New Mexico thus increases the potential for irony. [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:57 pm by Phil Dixon
The defendants were unvaccinated and objected to striking unvaccinated jurors from the jury pool. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Dennis Aftergut
In contrast to Smith’s approach, judge-shopping from the start in Missouri v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
SOC’s status as a rancher made her the go-to expert within the SCT building for water rights — this is from a cert pool memo in California v. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 1:38 pm by Juan C. Antúnez
Federal courts may have broader jury pools that span multiple counties than state courts, which may limit their juries to residents of one particular county. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John Elwood
So through the cert pool and other mechanisms, the justices identify a subset of cases that they need to discuss at their regular private conferences, known as the “discuss list. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 10:39 am by Jason Rantanen
The second, In re Boloro (Appeal nos. 2019-2349, -2351, -2353), Sept. 16, 2021, was an order by the Federal Circuit remanding the case to allow Bolero to request Director rehearing of the final written decisions in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]