Search for: "State v. Spot"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 3,007
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2010, 11:29 am
In Espinoza v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 11:18 am
Ainsworth v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
The most obvious class of examples, as I discussed on Monday and as I explain at greater length in the article, consists of so-called "percentage" plans by which various states guarantee admission to a state university to students graduating in a specified top percentage of their respective high school classes.For example, in his dissent in Fisher v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
Stefano Barazza talks us through Medtronic v Mirowski in this PatLit post. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:32 pm
(John Elwood) Lawrence Hurley at Greenwire (now up on the NY Times website) is reporting that the Justice Department asked that Professor Larry Tribe’s name be stricken from the brief he filed in American Electric Power v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 3:31 am
In his post-trial opinion issued last week in Grove v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 5:47 am
In Katz v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:33 am
Verner and Wisconsin v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 2:42 pm
" United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:38 am
Beginning in January of 2010, DiFilippo and other members of the task force conducted spot surveillance, installed a pole camera in Oladosu's neighborhood and obtained a pen registeron his cell phones. [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:54 am
Imbler v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:15 pm
Ted Frank has a good round up of analysis on the potential problems spots at Point of Law; And Howard Erichson reports on a plaintiffs-only conference to discuss the settlement;From the miscellaneous category: New York State practitioners should take note of a reversal in Raffellini v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:37 pm
So for now, we can add the Seattle legislation to the long list of hot spots where the ultimate treatment of gig workers will be playing out. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
On the spot, the applicant was told he could not work for the restaurant chain because of his condition. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:14 pm
In Stonebridge Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:12 am
Additional Resources: South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 9:46 pm
It looks to be maybe all of six inches deep in spots. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:09 am
In State v. [read post]
