Search for: "State v. State" Results 1661 - 1680 of 258,365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2024, 11:41 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Nonimmigrants in valid V-1 or V-2/V-3 status or K-3/K-4 status who have an I-485 application pending also do not need advance parole. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 10:00 am by Comitz Stanley
However, not all sources of other income are fair game, as evidenced in the case of Aisenberg v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:56 am by Josh Blackman
" On top of dangerous and extreme decisions that overturn settled legal precedents — including Roe v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:03 am by vrose
Court of Appeals to Hear Early Voting Challenge Appeal Tomorrow  The state’s highest court will hear arguments tomorrow at 11:00 AM in Stefanik v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:57 am
There's also Shakespeare's "Once more unto the breach," from Henry V. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:07 am by Harrison Blank
United States Philip Bobbitt, A Prudential Way Forward in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In contrast, in disciplinary actions pursuant to §75 of the New York State Civil Service Law the courts have held that "the imposition of multiple penalties was improper" as Civil Service Law §75.3 provides for a choice of penalties, thus prohibiting the imposition of more than one of the discrete penalties set out in the statute [see Matteson v City of Oswego, 186 AD2d 1017]. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In contrast, in disciplinary actions pursuant to §75 of the New York State Civil Service Law the courts have held that "the imposition of multiple penalties was improper" as Civil Service Law §75.3 provides for a choice of penalties, thus prohibiting the imposition of more than one of the discrete penalties set out in the statute [see Matteson v City of Oswego, 186 AD2d 1017]. [read post]