Search for: "State v. State"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 258,365
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2024, 11:41 am
Nonimmigrants in valid V-1 or V-2/V-3 status or K-3/K-4 status who have an I-485 application pending also do not need advance parole. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:40 am
If we look at Naranjo v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:23 am
Read the opinion The post RICKY CHARLES v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:14 am
Read the opinion The post GRAHAM SCHIFF v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:11 am
Read the opinion The post JONATHAN ENGLISH v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:04 am
United v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 10:29 am
In Ganpat v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 10:00 am
However, not all sources of other income are fair game, as evidenced in the case of Aisenberg v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:59 am
In a ruling regarding the collective complaint Unión General de Trabajadores (UGT) v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:56 am
" On top of dangerous and extreme decisions that overturn settled legal precedents — including Roe v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:44 am
In EcoFactor, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:20 am
For example in People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:17 am
In the second case, Panasonic v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:03 am
Court of Appeals to Hear Early Voting Challenge Appeal Tomorrow The state’s highest court will hear arguments tomorrow at 11:00 AM in Stefanik v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 8:24 am
United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:57 am
There's also Shakespeare's "Once more unto the breach," from Henry V. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:07 am
United States Philip Bobbitt, A Prudential Way Forward in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:06 am
The case was Trump v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In contrast, in disciplinary actions pursuant to §75 of the New York State Civil Service Law the courts have held that "the imposition of multiple penalties was improper" as Civil Service Law §75.3 provides for a choice of penalties, thus prohibiting the imposition of more than one of the discrete penalties set out in the statute [see Matteson v City of Oswego, 186 AD2d 1017]. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In contrast, in disciplinary actions pursuant to §75 of the New York State Civil Service Law the courts have held that "the imposition of multiple penalties was improper" as Civil Service Law §75.3 provides for a choice of penalties, thus prohibiting the imposition of more than one of the discrete penalties set out in the statute [see Matteson v City of Oswego, 186 AD2d 1017]. [read post]